Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Rivas Hernandez, from Lake Elsinore in California, had been missing and was last seen in April 2024, according to a missing person flyer cited by CBS, the BBC's US news partner.
。关于这个话题，旺商聊官方下载提供了深入分析
Гангстер одним ударом расправился с туристом в Таиланде и попал на видео18:08
dominating the US market, leaving IBM little room to fit in.。关于这个话题，Line官方版本下载提供了深入分析
Peter 1 is Chandra Kuber Khapung, then inspector general of police.
Just hours after his graduation in 1952, the newly commissioned Ensign Lovell married her.。safew官方版本下载是该领域的重要参考